> > Интересно, на иконе написано Maximian вместо Максиан, у кого ошибка? У греков этой памяти не нахожу.
На заметку: На ОСА - "Presbyter Maximian", see "Hieromartyr Lucian the Bishop at Beauvais in France": http://oca.org/saints/lives/2018/06/03/101596
У Олбана Батлера: "Максимиан (в простонародье Мессиен)". См. у него же:
1) "Maximian, called by the common people Messien [, and Julian, the companions of his labours, were crowned with martyrdom at the same place a little before him.]";
2) "His relics, with those of his two colleagues, were discovered in the seventh age, as St. Owen informs us in his life of St. Eligius."
3) "St. Lucian is styled only martyr, in most calendars down to the sixteenth century, and in the Roman Martyrology, and the calendar of the English protestants, in all which it is presumed that he was only priest; but a calendar compiled in the reign of Lewis le debonnaire, 1 gives him the title of bishop, and he is honoured in that quality at Beauvais";
4) "though the two lives of this saint, published by him, and thought to be one of the ninth, the other of the tenth, age, are of little or no authority";
5) "vicar or successor to the bloody persecutor Rictius Varus, in the government of Gaul, about the year 290".
Источник: (January 8) St. Lucian, Apostle of Beauvais, in France, Martyr // Rev. Alban Butler. The Lives of the Saints. Volume I: January. 1866: http://www.bartleby.com/210/1/083.html
> Да, у греков странно что не находится память их
Просто греки в Римский мартиролог давно не заглядывали (плохая шутка).
> но с церк. слав. подписью... там - правильно - Максиан
Имя Максиан на церк. слав., видимо, вышло из-под пера свт. Димитрия Ростовского (или c "легкой руки" его справщиков). Известно, что свт. Димитрий "не чурался" работ историка Рим. Церкви кардинала Цезаре Барония. Возможно, в ориг. у свт. было "Массиан", да "модераторы" подсуетились.
|